<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>blog.rudnyi.ru</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rudnyi.ru/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rudnyi.ru</link>
	<description>Open Archives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:48:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Computers have emotions</title>
		<link>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/02/computers-have-emotions.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/02/computers-have-emotions.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evgenii Rudnyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consciousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey A. Gray]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rudnyi.ru/?p=937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My messages to the everything-list: http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list/t/0ba5f90b7e68bccf 03.02.2012 21:23: Craig&#8217;s position that computers in the present form do not have emotions is not unique, as emotions belong to consciousness. A quote from my favorite book Jeffrey A. Gray,  Consciousness: Creeping up on the Hard Problem The last sentence from the chapter &#8220;10.2 Conscious computers?&#8221; p. 128 &#8220;Our [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/02/computers-have-emotions.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biology and Physics</title>
		<link>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/02/biology-and-physics.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/02/biology-and-physics.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evgenii Rudnyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey A. Gray]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rudnyi.ru/?p=933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My messages to the everything-list http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list/t/79a721c063a6c37a 28.01.2012 13:04: Let my quote Jeffrey Gray  (Consciousness: Creeping up on the Hard Problem, p. 33) on biology and physics. &#8220;In very general terms, biology makes use of two types of concept: physicochemical laws and feedback mechanisms. The latter include both the feedback operative in natural selection, in which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/02/biology-and-physics.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Absolute Presupposition</title>
		<link>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/02/absolute-presupposition.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/02/absolute-presupposition.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evgenii Rudnyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maarten Hoenen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rudnyi.ru/?p=931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his lectures Was ist Philosophie? http://www.podcasts.uni-freiburg.de/podcast_content?id_content=80 Prof Hoenen has discussed R. G. Collingwood and his work Essay on Methaphysics. I like here a lot the term Absolute Presupposition. From Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/collingwood/ &#8220;From the mid-thirties onwards Collingwood&#8217;s work increasingly engaged in a dialogue with the newly emerging school of analytic philosophy. In An [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/02/absolute-presupposition.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turing Test and Female Hormones</title>
		<link>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/01/turing-test-and-female-hormones.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/01/turing-test-and-female-hormones.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evgenii Rudnyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rudnyi.ru/?p=923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My message to the everything-list (for discussion follow the link)  http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list/t/99e8321645a80200 On 16.01.2012 10:24 Bruno Marchal said the following: &#8230; &#62; &#62; Note also that Turing invented his test to avoid the philosophical &#62; hard issue of consciousness. In a nutshell Turing defines &#62; &#8220;consciousness&#8221; by &#8220;having an intelligent behavior&#8221;. The Turing test &#62; is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/01/turing-test-and-female-hormones.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reason, Free Will, and the Big Bang</title>
		<link>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/01/reason-free-will-and-the-big-bang.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/01/reason-free-will-and-the-big-bang.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evgenii Rudnyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maarten Hoenen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rudnyi.ru/?p=918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have recently listened to Kontroversen in der Philosophie by Prof Hoenen: http://www.podcasts.uni-freiburg.de/podcast_content?id_content=93 One of the controversies there was the question whether the Universe if eternal or not. Recently I have employed the logic from the lectures on the everything list http://groups.google.com/group/t/thread/ba5f90b7e68bccf when there was a comment about determinism. I hope that the dialog below shows [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/01/reason-free-will-and-the-big-bang.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making Matter Come Alive</title>
		<link>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/01/making-matter-come-alive.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/01/making-matter-come-alive.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evgenii Rudnyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rudnyi.ru/?p=913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jason Resch on the everything list maked a link to a nice video 20.01.2012 02:34 Jason Resch: &#8220;Some have argued that cars are alive. They evolve, consume, move, reproduce and so on. While they are dependent on humans for reproduction, we too depend on a a very specific environment to reproduce. Much like viruses.&#8221; Lee Cronin: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/01/making-matter-come-alive.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon</title>
		<link>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/01/information.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/01/information.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evgenii Rudnyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermodynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rudnyi.ru/?p=908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My message to the everything list On 14.01.2012 08:21 John Clark said the following: &#62; On Thu, Jan 12, 2012  Craig Weinberg&#60;whatsonster@gmail.com&#62;  wrote: … &#62; For heavens sake, I went into quite a lot of detail about how the &#62; code is executed so that protein gets made, and it could not be more &#62; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/01/information.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Turing Test for Consciousness</title>
		<link>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/01/the-turing-test-for-consciousness.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/01/the-turing-test-for-consciousness.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evgenii Rudnyi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consciousness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rudnyi.ru/?p=905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the discusion on the everything-list: http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list/t/4c12841ff0dd1ff0 14.01.2012 18:12 John Clark: &#8220;To do any one of the things you suggest would require intelligence, and indeed there is some evidence that in general social animals tend to have a larger brain than similar species that are not social. But at any rate we both seem to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/01/the-turing-test-for-consciousness.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

